It is Time to End the Death Penalty

April 8, 2019

California holds the highest number of inmates on death row in the Western Hemisphere. On March 12th, Gavin Newsom, the newly elected governor of the state of California, signed an executive order which put a temporary suspension on the death penalty in California. The executive order also pardons 737 awaiting death row. The measure is a step in the right direction for California, it moves us towards a more progressive state.

The United States Constitution’s eighth amendment claims “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.” Allowing capital punishment is in direct contradiction with our constitution.

Most people claim the death penalty’s main function is deterring crime. If criminals know that there is an ultimate punishment, they are less likely to commit violent offenses. But according to a 2016 study by, states that enforce the death penalty have a 25% higher rate of murder than states that don’t. Proving that the death penalty does not help reduce crime. Therefore why is it still in existence?

Over 160 inmates facing death row have even been exonerated, this is proof that the death penalty should not exist. It is a tricky moral line that the government should take no part in. Innocent people have been executed by the hands of the state.

The United States has more prisoners per capita than any other country. Therefore a large part of our taxes goes towards funding the upkeep of prisons and its occupants. Many argue that the death penalty solves our prison budget issues; if there are fewer prisoners, then there will be more money from taxes fund education, healthcare and so on. But this is not the case, keeping prisoners on death row is actually more expensive. Several states have concluded that keeping prisoners on death row is far more costly than life sentences. Inmates facing death row also have longer court cases; lawyers who work on these cases claim that more time and resources are put into them, and therefore they charge more than other criminal cases. After the ruling is confirmed for these inmates awaiting the death penalty, they must be placed into solitary confinement, which factors in security and spacing issues, in total costing the taxpayer even more.

“Using conservative rough projections, the Commission estimates the annual costs of the present system ($137 million per year), the present system after implementation of the reforms … ($232.7 million per year) … and a system which imposes a maximum penalty of lifetime incarceration instead of the death penalty ($11.5 million).”

-California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice, July 1, 2008

Overall, the government should not be able to decide who lives or dies. Whether an individual agrees or disagrees that rapists and murderers must “get a taste of their own medicine”, it should not be up to the government to determine whether a citizen’s life is spared or not. Capital punishment denies people the most basic right, the right to live. This can lead to corruption on many fronts. For one, citizen’s can face death row for espionage, which would be determined by the government. Therefore, we have provided a route for the government to punish those they find unfaithful and unpatriotic.

Although the African American population of the United States is just over 13%, half of the inmates facing death row are black. Capital punishment highlights the institutionalized racism people of color face in this country. 80% of the inmates awaiting the death penalty have executed white people, but only a handful have been white inmates who executed people of color. The death penalty harms people of color, it is a clear systematic injustice that has been ignored.

Many other countries have eliminated the death penalty and have turned to other means of correction. In most European countries the goal of imprisonment is not punishment but rehabilitation, these countries recognize that it is unethical for the government to take someone’s life. In 2007, the United Nations urged all countries to rid the capital punishment. The United States opposed this and was only supported by North Korea, Iran, Sudan, and China. Not only has the United States kept a pattern of violence towards their offenders, but they also refused to improve its justice system, and rather sided with nondemocratic countries.

Capital punishment has corrupted our country for far too long. It has remained a barbaric approach to incarceration and emphasized the oppression in our justice system. Thus, abolishing it would allow our country to move forward into a true restorative criminal justice system.




2 Responses to “It is Time to End the Death Penalty”

  1. Andrew Friedman on April 22nd, 2019 7:15 pm

    First I would like to say that I agree with the claim the author is making. I thought the claims they made worked well. I thought the claim in the second paragraph was very important in the development of the essay. Using the law in an essay is always effective. I didn’t know that amendment existed and it make me think about other world problems. Also the part about racism in the courtroom is unjust. Eighty Percent of people on death row happened to be of color. This has been proven with evidence . It is disgusting that a moral issue, is killing people. 80% is a despicable number and the judges that have sentence people to this torture should be investigated. I agree with the last paragraph, when it said that I would move our country forward to a better criminal justice system. If this is abolished, it gives a chance to people who have made mistakes in their life To make things better with their families and friends. That is why the death penalty should be abolished.

  2. Paniz T on May 30th, 2019 10:38 am

    I personally think that death penalty should not be allowed, but for some crimes such as mass shooting, or raping it should be allowed. Mass shootings are taking place all over the U.S in schools, clubs, public places. Some mistakes should not be forgiven and people who are committing such crimes should face death penalty. Mass shooters took away a lot of peoples life and they should not get away with it easily, because they made the wrong decision. Some criminals might deserve a second chance but not all of them. People who are underage and commit a severe crime are more likely to get out of prison because they were young and immature, but they can be dangerous for the society and commit even more crimes. I do not think that it should be allowed but for some criminals the state should allow death penalty so that people make better choices and do not repeat the same mistake ever again.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.

Taft Tribune • Copyright 2020 • FLEX WordPress Theme by SNOLog in